<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>zerolight &#187; HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/tag/hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Gaming, Guitars, and Family Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PS3 Wishlist</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/ps3-wishlist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/ps3-wishlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve had the PS3 a little while now and find that there’s a few simple things that I hope Sony will integrate into the OS. Sure, it could have a better online service, and better integration of your friends list into games, and better use of voice chat, and all the other things we’ve come [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve had the PS3 a little while now and find that there’s a few simple things that I hope Sony will integrate into the OS. Sure, it could have a better online service, and better integration of your friends list into games, and better use of voice chat, and all the other things we’ve come to love about the 360. But none of those are as important to me as the following.</p>
<p>1. Independent resolutions for the Dashboard, Gaming, and Blu-Ray playback. I’d like to be able to set my Dashboard and Gaming to 720p, and Blu-Ray movie playback to 1080i. Developers can already force games to 720p regardless of dashboard resolution, so why not just expand the options and make them available to the user. This would be great because…</p>
<li>The dashboard is far better (at least on 1360×768 / 720p TVs) at 720p &#8211; it makes using the web-browser (particularly with per pixel view enabled) a lovely couch potato experience.</li>
<li>Games run better at 720p. Forget all the hype Sony would have you believe about true HD being 1080p &#8211; MS were right all along, this generation, 720p is the sweet spot for gaming, above that and current hardware can’t cope so framerates drop, graphical effects pale, and so on.</li>
<li>Right now, the only way you can actually watch a Blu-Ray movie in HD is to set your PS3 to output at 1080i or 1080p as the PS3 can’t actually display them at 720p. A hassle if your gaming and browsing preference is 720p. Soon you will be able to watch Blu-Ray at 720p, but even then I’ll still want to watch them at 1080i because there’s less scaling involved than at 720p. ie. 1900×1080 -&gt; 1360×768 as opposed to 1900×1080 -&gt; 1280×720 -&gt; 1360×768. Add in a bit of overscan and that 2nd option has a lot of scaling. More scaling = poorer picture.</li>
<p>2. What’s the point of setting up the audio formats your AV amp supports only to have Blu Ray movies default to plain old DD 5.1 (640kps bitrate)? Should I really have to go into the options menu of my Casino Royale disc in order to enable uncompressed 5.1 surround (4.6Mbps bitrate)? How about making the PS3 a bit more intelligent &#8211; isn’t that Cell processor meant to be a <em>super computer</em> ? Let me choose my preferred audio and video options, then actually use them.</p>
<p>3. Let me stream movies from my Mac. In any format. And while your at it Mr Sony, let me also stream MP3s and Photos.</p>
<div class="utw">
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/PS3"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/ps3-wishlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu Ray Impressions &#8211; Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/blu-ray-impressions-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/blu-ray-impressions-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony delivered my free copy of James Bond: Casino Royale today. Nice surprise that one. I’ve watched about 30 mins of it thus far (well I have seen it several times already on DVD and at the Movies). Impressions are as follows. Picture quality is a step up from Terminator 2, I guess camera technology [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony delivered my free copy of James Bond: Casino Royale today. Nice surprise that one. I’ve watched about 30 mins of it thus far (well I have seen it several times already on DVD and at the Movies). Impressions are as follows. Picture quality is a step up from Terminator 2, I guess camera technology has advanced some what in the past decade or two. Casino Royale looks much better than it’s DVD counterpart, and a step up from the compressed HD preview available on the PS Store. Check out the photo below, and apologies for the glare coming from the window… I really should have closed the blinds. I’m still not entirely convinced that the masses are going to flock to the new HD media over regular DVD, but that’s another debate.</p>
<p>The biggest surprise was the Audio. Casino Royale has regular Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtracks and a full, uncompressed, linear PCM 5.1 surround track. The difference is very impressive. Regular DD has a bitrate of 640kps which works out at 106kps per channel, which is pretty much an average MP3. Linear PCM 5.1 has a bitrate of 4600kps which works out at 766kps per channel. That’s a 7 fold increase in definition, which I guess is like comparing low bit rate MP3 with CD. The difference is noticeable. It’s not just more detailed (though the rain in the opening jungle scene was most impressive) but also a much fuller, stronger, louder sound. It really is Hi-Fi. It delivers that cinema experience like never before. I look forward to experiencing the Matrix on Blu Ray one day as that has a particularly good soundtrack which can only benefit from HD audio.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Casino Royale Blu-Ray" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/86015739@N00/468063409/" target="_blank"><br />
</a></strong></p>
<div class="utw">
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/PS3"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/blu-ray-impressions-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/blu-ray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/blu-ray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technorati Blu Ray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terminator 2 arrived yesterday on Blu Ray. I’ve been looking forward to trying out a Blu Ray movie and T2 is apparently one of the best available in terms of picture and sound quality. Certainly, you get the full 1.5Mbps DTS sound track in comparison to the 640kps Dolby Digital sound track. Video quality is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminator 2 arrived yesterday on Blu Ray. I’ve been looking forward to trying out a Blu Ray movie and T2 is apparently one of the best available in terms of picture and sound quality. Certainly, you get the full 1.5Mbps DTS sound track in comparison to the 640kps Dolby Digital sound track. Video quality is also very good, you get wonderfully crisp and sharp pictures with lots of colour. You’ll spot the film grain from the original film, but that’s something that’s always going to be apparent in HD, unless the Movie was originally filmed on a Digital camera, which is starting to happen more an more, though many directors still prefer film. Don’t confuse the lines in the picture below as film grain, that’s just the result of photographing a TV screen.</p>
<p>The thing is, just like HDTV, the picture does look better than DVD, but it’s not knock-your-socks-off, blow-your-mind better. You won’t see the difference in video quality that you saw going from VHS to DVD, and as such I find it hard to see the masses flocking to either HD-DVD or Blu Ray in favour of DVD. Instead I see it as a format that only the most dedicated gadget lovers will buy, just like SACD and DVD-Audio, both of which ended up failing to replace CD. Still, I’d love to be proven wrong, and I’m rooting for Blu Ray over HD-DVD for no reason other than I have a Blu Ray player in my PS3. Check out the images below for a comparison (click to enlarge).</p>
<p><a title="Blu Ray" rel="lightbox[T2]" href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/207/468051662_0a7fa1a7e1_o.jpg"><strong><br />
</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/04/blu-ray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>fl0w &#8211; PS3</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/fl0w-ps3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/fl0w-ps3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the latest game to hit the PS3 Store is fl0w. A soothing and pretty thing. I say thing, because it’s not really a game, there’s not really much to do, and certainly no high scores to be chased. It’s a rather odd, if relaxing experience. I’d like to say I can’t recommend it enough, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the latest <em>game</em> to hit the PS3 Store is fl0w. A soothing and pretty thing. I say thing, because it’s not really a game, there’s not really much to do, and certainly no high scores to be chased. It’s a rather odd, if relaxing experience. I’d like to say I can’t recommend it enough, but instead I kinda feel more like I can’t recommend it. It’s not that I don’t like it, or is it? I don’t know. I imagine if you were stoned it’d be quite an experience. You can actually play a version right <a href="http://intihuatani.usc.edu/cloud/flowing/" target="_blank">here</a> in your web browser. Obviously the PS3 version is prettier, but it controls easier with a mouse than the sixaxis tilt sensor.</p>
<p><em>edit: I think I like it.</em></p>
<div class="utw">
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/PS3"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/fl0w-ps3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDMI for HD Audio</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/hdmi-for-hd-audio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/hdmi-for-hd-audio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never really understood what HDMI was all about, assuming that it was simply a digital video standard. I think most people are of that opinion. But some research today into why my PS3 is kicking out Multi Channel Linear PCM instead of Dolby Digital or DTS has led me to realise that HDMI is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never really understood what HDMI was all about, assuming that it was simply a digital video standard. I think most people are of that opinion. But some research today into why my PS3 is kicking out Multi Channel Linear PCM instead of Dolby Digital or DTS has led me to realise that HDMI is all about high bandwidth audio.</p>
<p>HD players such as the PS3 can decode the new HD audio CODECs (used on Blu Ray and HD DVD) and send them to an AV amp via HDMI as MPCM (Multi Channel Linear PCM data). Thus, if your amp can accept MPCM over HDMI then it doesn’t need to be able to decode the new HD Audio CODECs such as TrueHD or DTS HD. Instead these are decoded by the source (eg. PS3) and sent to the amp via HDMI. Which explains why my Denon AV3806 displays “MULTI CH IN” when I connect the PS3.</p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=496754" target="_blank">link</a> explains it way better than I could ever do.</p>
<div class="utw">
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/PS3"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/hdmi-for-hd-audio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PS3 Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/ps3-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/ps3-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, 1 day back from SA and a new gadget. What’s it like? Surprisingly good. I nearly didn’t buy one, but I’m glad I did. It’s certainly eye-candy in terms of looks, with a lovely hi-tech shiny look to the consoles casing. Once up and running the interface is simple, yet elegant. The same can’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, 1 day back from SA and a new gadget. What’s it like? Surprisingly good. I nearly didn’t buy one, but I’m glad I did. It’s certainly eye-candy in terms of looks, with a lovely hi-tech shiny look to the consoles casing. Once up and running the interface is simple, yet elegant. The same can’t be said of the PS Store where you can download demos, videos, etc… it’s simple, yet, well it’s simple… leave it at that.</p>
<p>The only disappointment on the hardware front is the pad, which is the worst I’ve ever used. The triggers are convex instead of concave… which results in your fingers insisting on slipping off the triggers. So you have to press harder than normal to keep a grip. Add to that the compact size of the pad and it just leads to arm and hand fatigue. This is lessened somewhat by using your middle fingers instead of index fingers on the triggers, though this feels so odd that you find yourself reverting to index fingers again.</p>
<p>The games I’ve bought are Motorstorm and VF5. First impressions of Motorstorm are very very good. It’s beautiful, smooth, and very hard. I love it. It’s a lot of fun, surprisingly deep for an off-road arcade racer, and has top notch physics and handling. Definitely the best launch game on the system, and one of the best next gen games on any console. VF5 is again a beautiful looker with a smooth framerate. Disappointingly though, you can’t choose a preferred resolution for the game, so it defaults to the dashboard resolution. Not a big problem, though games tend to run better at 720p whilst movies and the dashboard are better at 1080i. My one gripe after a short time with VF5 is around the controls. At times, pressing the buttons did nothing. Button lag? A bug? A one off? I don’t know, I’ll boot it up again tomorrow to see if it’s still there. It’s certainly a gamebreaker… so the jury is still out on VF5.</p>
<p>I’ve not tried any media playback yet, but like the 360, it only plays certain formats. Unlike the 360 you can’t stream though, unless you install Linux on the PS3, which I’m not inclined to do. When you first register your PS3 and select an online ID it makes mention of the Blu Ray Disc offer. A google suggests that the first 500,000 registered users get a free copy of Casino Royale on Blu Ray… so here’s hoping. For now, I have no Blu Ray Discs so can’t comment on performance. I’ll wait for the R2 version of T2.</p>
<p>All in all, very happy. It’s keeping me away from Crackdown on the 360 at the moment, which is telling as Crackdown is superb. I’m unlikely to be lured back to the 360 in a hurry, that is, until Forza 2 hits the 360 in May. Motorstorm rocks. Who said the PS3 didn’t have a killer app?</p>
<p><em>Update: I’m not seeing any button lag in VF5 today, so that must have been a one off. It’s a lovely game too, but very complex.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B0007SV734.02._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_V42193013_.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div class="utw">
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/PS3"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/03/ps3-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Def Footie</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/01/high-def-footie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/01/high-def-footie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BBC HD showed the Arsenal / Liverpool game today. It’s my first real taste of a sports event, in HD, on my own TV. Very impressive it was too. Comparing the Standard Definition broadcast with the HDTV broadcast showed a marked improvement that doesn’t quite come across in still shots (all TV is broadcast at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC HD showed the Arsenal / Liverpool game today. It’s my first real taste of a sports event, in HD, on my own TV. Very impressive it was too. Comparing the <a title="SDTV" rel="lightbox" href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/175/468070703_4392737117_b.jpg">Standard Definition</a> broadcast with the <a title="HDTV" rel="lightbox" href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/186/468070913_d883871f4f_b.jpg">HDTV broadcast</a> showed a marked improvement that doesn’t quite come across in still shots (all TV is broadcast at 24.5 fps with a little motion blur applied to simulate smooth motion). Photos in this <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/zerolight/sets/72157600107016650/" target="_blank&quot;">HDTV</a> flickr set.</p>
<p><a title="HDTV Football" href="http://flickr.com/photos/86015739@N00/468070505" target="_blank"><strong><br />
</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2007/01/high-def-footie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony KDL-40V2000 LCD Arrived</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/06/sony-kdl-40v2000-lcd-arrived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/06/sony-kdl-40v2000-lcd-arrived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nice folk at Robert Whyte did me a pretty good deal on a Sony 40V2000 LCD in exchange for my Philips 9986 which has been faulty (although not according to Philips, since day one). Initial impressions are very good. DVDs are far nicer on the Sony than they were on the Philips. The Sony [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nice folk at Robert Whyte did me a pretty good deal on a Sony 40V2000 LCD in exchange for my Philips 9986 which has been faulty (although not according to Philips, since day one). Initial impressions are very good. DVDs are far nicer on the Sony than they were on the Philips. The Sony would appear to have a better scaler, as well as class leading colour rendition. The result is a very natural looking picture. Not something you often see from an LCD displaying standard definition sources. NTL doesn’t fair quite so well, the bigger screen size highlighting the artefacts present in NTLs standard definition signal. Though it thus displays a little more noise than the Philips here, the NTL picture still benefits from the Sony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/06/sony-kdl-40v2000-lcd-arrived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philips final word on the PF9986</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/04/philips-final-word-on-the-pf9986/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/04/philips-final-word-on-the-pf9986/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been a couple of months since I last heard from Philips. I’ve been hung out to dry. The Philips director, whom I’ve been dealing with over this matter, started out on this whole debacle as a nice guy trying to help. He even sent out some of his colleagues to look into the issues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been a couple of months since I last heard from Philips. I’ve been hung out to dry.</p>
<p>The Philips director, whom I’ve been dealing with over this matter, started out on this whole debacle as a nice guy trying to help. He even sent out some of his colleagues to look into the issues I was experiencing with the TV. Over the course of the weeks and months that followed he became less helpful and more aggressive.</p>
<p><a id="more-157"></a>One excuse followed another, with ridiculous claims as to the cause and that in fact the TV was functioning correctly. Each claim I debunked. Finally I sent photographic evidence of the problem (documented elsewhere on this site) and explained in detail what the problem was, such that it was undeniable. Again he came back with more painfully idiotic excuses before essentially threatening me not to take the action further.</p>
<p>Every single reason they gave for the issue was laughable and without foundation. I personally believe that Philips felt that repairing my TV would open the flood gates to more requests for repair as the fault exists on all PF9986 LCDs, not just an isolated few, and this would cost them money. It’s especially sad given that a firmware update might well have resolved the matter.</p>
<p>The PF9986 was Philips flag-ship TV. It cost a lot of money. It should have been fault free. Philips should have rectified the fault or replaced the set the minute the fault was reported. Instead they have a poor after-sales service, and are quite happy to leave the customer hanging with a faulty TV. I’d never buy from Philips again.</p>
<div class="utw">
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/LCD+TV"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/04/philips-final-word-on-the-pf9986/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philips 9986 Problems Continue</title>
		<link>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/03/philips-9986-problems-continue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/03/philips-9986-problems-continue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zerolight</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three and a half months. That’s how long it’s been since I notified Robert Whytes and Philips that there were issues with the PF9986 HD LCD TV. For almost half that time they had the TV in their workshop. Yet the fault still exists. The fault, in case you’ve not been reading my blog, has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three and a half months. That’s how long it’s been since I notified Robert Whytes and Philips that there were issues with the PF9986 HD LCD TV. For almost half that time they had the TV in their workshop. Yet the fault still exists.</p>
<p>The fault, in case you’ve not been reading my blog, has to do with the way the TV displays a 1280×720p signal over component. It does a fine job over VGA, but over component it shifts the image off the side of the screen. Philips say that all you have to do is use the cursor on the TV remote to bring the image back onto the screen. Unfortunately, they don’t provide enough adjustment to do so, and you’re left with a 1cm wide strip of the picture missing on the right edge of the screen, this in addition to the unfortunate borders which you must live with if you buy an 9986.</p>
<p>The borders are one thing. I knew that when I bought the TV. But losing some of the image, even just that 1cm wide strip off the right side, is very poor on a ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zerolight.co.uk/blog/2006/03/philips-9986-problems-continue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
